Issue 19 (June 2025)
  • Recent amendments

  • Overview of the Amended Regulations

  • Increase in the VAT rate

  • Changes to the VAT Refund Administrator 

  • Publications

Recent amendments

The public was alerted to the publication of the 2024 draft tax bills and the draft Regulations on 31 August 2024 in VAT Connect Issue 18. These bills and draft Regulations have since been promulgated and the following Acts containing amendments to the VAT Act as well as the Regulations were published. These amendment Acts were all promulgated on 24 December 2024 as per Government Gazettes (GGs) 51826, 51827, 51829, and 51828 respectively. The amendments come into effect on 1 April 2025 unless otherwise stated.

These documents can be accessed via the SARS website by clicking on the links below:

Explanatory Memoranda to the above Acts and Regulations can be accessed by clicking on the links below:

A summary of some of the more important VAT amendments is provided below:

  • Resident of the Republic – Before the amendment, the definition of “resident of the Republic” referred to the definition of “resident” in section 1(1) of the Income Tax Act, which in turn, in the case of a person other than a natural person, includes a person that has its place of effective management in the Republic. Consequently, supplies by South African companies to its foreign subsidiaries that had their place of effective management in the Republic, were excluded from the zero-rating provisions under section 11(2)(ℓ) despite these foreign subsidiaries being incorporated and having a fixed place of business in a foreign country with no consumption of such services taking place in the Republic. Since the foreign subsidiaries do not conduct any enterprise activities in the Republic, these subsidiaries are unable to register as vendors to unlock the VAT charged. This resulted in a permanent cost for businesses. The amendment to the definition of “resident of the Republic” now excludes a person that is a ”resident” under the Income Tax Act, solely as a result of having its place of effective management in the Republic and that does not carry on any “enterprise” in the Republic.

  • Cross border leases of foreign owned ships, aircraft, rolling stock and parts thereto – On 1 April 2021 the definition of “enterprise” was amended and proviso (xiii) was added to clarify that a non-resident lessor of foreign owned ships, aircraft, and rolling stock are not considered to be conducting an enterprise in the Republic. Effective from 1 April 2023, this proviso was extended to include foreign owned parts relating to such foreign owned ships, aircraft, or rolling stock if those parts are leased under a separate agreement. As a result, foreign lessors that no longer carried on an “enterprise” were required to deregister as vendors. This led to an unintended consequence as these foreign lessors had to account for output tax on the deemed supply of any goods that formed part of the enterprise assets retained upon deregistration, even though these foreign lessors were not entitled to a deduction of input tax on the importation of those goods (see paragraph (cc) of proviso (xiii) to the definition of “enterprise”). To address this issue, proviso (vii) to section 8(2) has been inserted with the intention of releasing foreign lessors from the obligation to account for VAT on enterprise assets retained upon deregistration as a result of the aforementioned amendment, provided the requirements in the said proviso are met.

  • Foreign donor funded projects (FDFPs) – Significant changes to the registration regime for FDFPs took effect on 1 April 2020. These changes required an implementing agency to register a branch separate from the implementing agency’s own registration, for each FDFP managed and administered by that implementing agency. This created a considerable administrative burden for both SARS and the implementing agencies, especially those managing and administering multiple FDFPs. On the basis that international donor funding agreements typically require strict record-keeping, and approval is required for a FDFP from the Minister of Finance, the risk of abuse is mitigated. To ease the administrative burden, section 8(30) now allows for multiple FDFP VAT branches managed and administered by an implementing agency to be merged into a single FDFP VAT branch, provided the implementing agency complies with the additional documentary requirements under the amended section 50(2A). Section 50(2A) also includes special transitional rules for those FDFP projects that were already registered as separate VAT branches of the implementing agency before 1 January 2025. These amendments came into effect on 1 January 2025. For further information on this topic see the updated VAT Reference Guide for Foreign Donor Funded Projects (Issue 3).

  • Mudaraba Sharia Financing Arrangements – Various tax acts were amended to place Islamic finance on equal footing with traditional western finance from a taxation perspective. Given the diversity of Islamic finance, the focus was on the more prevalent Sharia compliant arrangements in South Africa at the time, namely, Mudarabah, Murabaha, and Diminishing Musharaka. However, section 8A that has been inserted with effect from 1 January 2013, initially made special provision only for Murabaha and Diminishing Musharaka. Section 8A(3) now clarifies that the return of profit under a Mudaraba arrangement will also be exempt from VAT. However, this exemption does not extend to any consideration in the form of a fee, commission, or similar charge.

  • Irrecoverable debts subsequently recovered – A vendor is allowed to deduct VAT on taxable supplies on which output tax has been previously accounted for to the extent of any amount subsequently written off as irrecoverable debts under section 22(1). If the vendor later recovers any of these amounts or any portion of those amounts, section 22(2) requires the vendor to repay the previously deducted VAT. Proviso (iv)(aa) to section 22(1) prevents a transferor of an account receivable at face value, on a non-recourse basis, from making a deduction based on the transfer. Whilst the recipient of such account was allowed to make a deduction of the tax amounts written off as irrecoverable, there was no rule for repaying these deductions if the amounts were later recovered. Section 22(2) has now been updated to include this rule.

  • Fuel levy goods and illuminating kerosene – Consequential amendments have been made to sections 11(1)(h) and (ℓ), as well as Schedule 1 due to amendments made to Schedule 1 of the Customs and Excise Act. These amendments are effective from 1 January 2002.

  • Electronic services and intermediaries – Section 54(2B) effective from 1 April 2019, required an intermediary to report and account for VAT on “electronic services” supplied on behalf of a foreign electronic services provider that was not registered for VAT (the principal) in the intermediary’s own VAT return. The foreign electronic services supplier that exceeded the VAT registration threshold, but failed to register, however, remained principally liable to register and account for the VAT in its own return. Section 54(2B) now allows the intermediary and the principal to agree in writing to treat a supply of electronic services by the intermediary on behalf of the principal, as being made by the intermediary. In this instance, both the intermediary and principal will be held jointly and severally liable for performing the relevant duties under the VAT Act and for paying the relevant tax on the taxable supplies made under such agreement. These amendments also apply to principals already registered for VAT (in their own capacity) to reduce the administrative burden on the principal, prevent double accounting of VAT by both the principal and the intermediary on the same supply, and facilitate compliance checks and audits. For more information on electronic services and intermediaries, see the Frequently Asked Questions: Electronic Services.

  • Imported services – Before the amendment to section 14(1), VAT on imported services had to be accounted for and paid within 30 days of the earlier of receipt of the invoice issued by the supplier or the recipient or the time any payment is made by the recipient in respect of that supply. Taxpayers experienced various practical difficulties in adhering to the 30-day rule, resulting in penalties and interest due. To alleviate the burden, the 30-day period under section 14(1) was extended to 60 days with effect from 24 December 2024.

  • Overpayments on imported services or the importation of goods – VAT is payable on “imported services”, and the importation of goods by any vendor within prescribed timelines. However, these VAT amounts may be reduced due to subsequent events such as the granting of a discount, an error in stating the original amount, a reduction in consideration charged, or the cancellation of the supply. Following the introduction of the Tax Administration Act, reductions in the amount of tax chargeable due to subsequent events in respect of the importation of goods by persons who are not registered as vendors (non-vendors), or in respect of imported services without an assessment, were not adequately catered for. This has now been rectified by allowing a vendor to make a deduction of the excess tax under section 16(3)(o) in respect of imported services. In addition, section 44(1) now provides for a refund on application by non-vendors of excess tax paid on imported services or the importation of goods, provided the claim is received within five years from the date the excess tax was paid. These amendments came into effect on 24 December 2024. See Binding General Ruling (BGR) 66 for more details on overpayments on the importation of goods by vendors.

  • Representative vendor and South African bank account – Section 23(2) deemed a person who is not a “resident of the Republic” to not have applied for registration until such person has appointed a representative vendor that is a resident in the Republic and opened a South African bank account. Many foreign entities, despite having no physical presence in the Republic, were required to register as vendors due to the wide definition of “enterprise”. These entities faced difficulties complying with these registration conditions. To provide relief, section 23(2) has now been amended to assist non‐resident vendors with limited or no presence in the Republic, in the circumstances specified in the proviso to section 23(2). These entities (including foreign suppliers of electronic services) must appoint a representative under the newly inserted section 46(2), although such natural person need not be a resident in the Republic. However, under the newly inserted section 23(2B), this relief is withdrawn if the entity no longer meets the requirements of sections 23(2)(b) and 46(1). These amendments are effective from 24 December 2024.
Overview of the Amended Regulations

Electronic Services Regulations

The rules regarding the application of the law relating to “electronic services” came into effect from 1 April 2014 (see VAT Connect Issue 4 (August 2014) for further information), and was amended with effect from 1 April 2019 (see VAT Connect Issue 9 (February 2019)).

The updated Electronic Services Regulations have been published as Notice 5993 in Government Gazette 52293 of 14 March 2025 and came into effect on 1 April 2025. The updated Electronic Services Regulation repeals, from 1 April 2025, all earlier Regulations published for this purpose.

In this regard, the Electronic Services Regulations have been updated with the following amendments:

  • The definition of “content” has been newly included, and the definition of “telecommunications services” has been revised to further elaborate on the meaning of “telecommunications system” within that definition. Since “content” was excluded from the definition of “telecommunications services”, it became necessary to define “content” separately.
  • A clarification regarding supplies between groups of companies, particularly in relation to global contracts, has been included. The amendment to regulation2(c)(ii) provides this clarity.
  • An exclusion from the definition of “electronic services” introduced as regulation 2(d) pertains to services provided from an export country by a non-resident person, where such supplies are made solely to vendors registered in the Republic under section 23 of the VAT Act. The effect of this “business-to-business” exclusion means that foreign suppliers that only provide services to other businesses in South Africa, provided the recipient businesses are registered vendors, will not be conducting an enterprise in South Africa, and will no longer be required to register as vendors. However, these supplies may still be subject to VAT under section 7(1)(c), which requires the recipient to declare VAT on imported services. The policy rationale behind this exclusion is to ease the administrative burden on suppliers, and recipients when there is minimal or no fiscal benefit.

A further amendment that will impact the “electronic service” regime is the amendment to section 54(2B) of the VAT Act discussed above. Before 1 April 2025, section 54(2B) of the VAT Act deemed a supply of electronic services to be made by the intermediary and not the principal, if the electronic services are supplied through an intermediary platform or online marketplace on behalf of the principal and –

  • the intermediary is a vendor;
  • the principal is not a resident, and not a registered vendor; and
  • the electronic services are supplied, or to be supplied to a person in South Africa (that is, the supplies made in the course of an enterprise for South African VAT purposes).

The amendments to section 54(2B) of the VAT Act have removed the requirement that the underlying supplier (the principal) must not be a registered vendor. This change aims to hold the vendor intermediary responsible for all supplies made through its platform, including those by principals that are not residents of the Republic, regardless of their VAT status in the Republic, provided that the principal and intermediary have agreed in writing to treat the supply as that of the intermediary. The policy rationale behind this amendment is to ease the administrative burden on the principal, ensure that VAT is not accounted for twice (by both the principal and the intermediary) on the same supply, and facilitate compliance checks and audits.

Additionally, when both parties agree to treat the supplies as being made by the intermediary, both the intermediary and principal will be held jointly and severally liable for performing the relevant duties under the VAT Act and for paying the relevant tax on the taxable supplies made under such agreement.

Domestic Reverse Charge Regulations

The Domestic Reverse Charge Regulations (the DRC Regulations) relating to certain transactions involving gold and other “valuable metals” was published as Notice 2140 in Government Gazette 46512 of 8 June 2022. Further amendments to the DRC Regulations were promulgated on 15 March 2025 and published as Notice 5995 in Government Gazette 52295. The following amendment to the DRC Regulations came into effect from 1 April 2025:

  • The exclusion from the DRC Regulations of supplies made by a “holder” or a person contracted to a holder, has been deleted. As a result of the deletion of that exclusion, the supplies made by a “holder”, or a person contracted to a holder will now fall within the DRC Regulations.

Casino table games of chance

The gambling industry does not operate within the usual confines of the VAT Act, and South Africa is one of the few countries that taxes betting transactions. A casino or bookmaker accounts for output tax on all bets placed and may deduct input tax on any winnings paid to punters. The nature of betting transactions in the casino industry, particularly table games of chance, makes it challenging to separate bets placed by punters from winnings paid to them.

Given the nature of table games of chance, the number of punters, the volume of bets placed, and the speed of the game, all of which are crucial for running a successful table operation, it is practically impossible to record each bet and payout for a casino table game of chance. These practicalities make it impossible for gaming operators to separate bets placed by punters from winnings paid to them.

As a result, the gambling industry was permitted to account for VAT by applying the tax fraction to net betting transactions (the amount remaining after winnings have been deducted, known as the “net drop method”) for casino games of chance under the section 72 arrangement contained in Binding General Ruling 13 (Issue 2) (BGR 13), issued on 22 March 2013.

The recent legislative amendment to section 72 of the VAT Act led to the expiry of BGR 13 on 31 December 2021, creating difficulties for suppliers of table games of chance when completing their VAT returns. As an interim measure, a decision was made under the amended provisions of section 72, contained in Binding General Ruling 59 (BGR 59), issued on 13 December 2021. Binding General Ruling 59 remains valid until it is withdrawn, amended, or the relevant legislation is amended.

In order to provide for the legislative framework for the gambling industry to account for VAT using the net drop method, the National Treasury has issued regulations on the method for determining the VAT liability of casino table games of chance (Casino Regulations) published as Notice No 5994 in Government Gazette 52294 of 15 March 2025. The Casino Regulations apply with effect from 1 January 2025. This means that BGR 59 will be effective until 31 December 2024.

There are three regulations, which are summarised below:

  • Regulation 1 defines certain terms for the purpose of application of the Casino Regulations.

Casino – “Casino” is defined with reference to the National Gambling Act 7 of 2004, that is operated by a person that is “licensed” as in that Act and is a registered vendor. The definition clarifies what is meant to be a “casino” and the group of vendors affected by the Casino Regulations.

Gross gaming revenue – “Gross gaming revenue” means an amount determined under the applicable provincial gambling legislation for each table game, and includes the closing bankroll plus credit slips for cash, chips, or tokens returned to the casino cage, plus drop, less opening bankroll and fills to the table. The definition clarifies the amount to be recognised as the “gross gaming revenue” in the Casino Regulations.

Table game of chance – “Table game of chance” is defined with reference to National Gambling Act 7 of 2004 that is played against the casino and operated by one or more live croupiers. The definition clarifies the type of the game Casino Regulations refers to.

  • Regulation 2 sets out what a casino may account for VAT on their VAT returns in respect of table games of chance.

A casino may account for VAT on their VAT returns in respect of table games of chance, on the “gross gaming revenue”, for the relevant tax period, subject to the following:

    • Gross gaming revenue in respect of table games of chance must be included in field 1 of the VAT return, with the tax fraction applied to that amount reflected in field 4.
    • Casinos are not entitled to any deductions under section 16(3)(d) of the VAT Act if such an amount has been included in calculating the gross gaming revenue.
    • Casinos are required to maintain adequate records to enable the Commissioner to verify the validity and accuracy of the tax liability calculated and included in the VAT return as set out above, and in particular, the records for the purpose of audits conducted by the provincial Gaming Boards.
  • Regulation 3 provides for short title and commencement.

Latest Scam Alert:  

Beware of fraud! Don’t fall for imposters pretending to be SARS sending notifications about payments. Always verify the authenticity of such messages on the Scams & Phishing webpage. 

Increase in the VAT rate

In the Minister of Finance’s Budget Speech on 12 March 2025 the proposal to increase the standard rate of VAT from 15% to 15.5% with effect from 1 May 2025 was announced. It was also announced that the VAT rate will increase from 15.5% to 16% effective from 1 April 2026. However, a subsequent media statement issued by the Ministry of Finance on 24 April 2025 indicated the Minister’s decision to retract the planned 0.5% VAT rate increase. Following this decision, the Minister on 24 April 2025, introduced the Rates and Monetary Amounts and the Amendment of Revenue Laws Bill [B14—2025] (Rates Bill), which proposes to maintain the VAT rate at 15% from 1 May 2025, instead of the proposed increase to VAT announced in the Budget in March.

In the media statement released by SARS on 25 April 2025, the Commissioner for SARS has noted the Finance Minister’s decision to retract the planned 0.5% VAT rate increase with effect from 1 May 2025. Additionally, the Commissioner acknowledges that vendors and consumers have invested in preparing for an increase in VAT during a period of uncertainty from Parliament’s deliberations and public comments. This decision has significant practical implications for VAT vendors, who may have updated their systems in line with the proposed increase, and for consumers acquiring goods and services from those vendors. As the administrator of all national government tax measures, SARS has ensured that the necessary adjustments are made to accommodate this change.

Changes to the VAT Refund Administrator

The VAT Refund Agency took over the responsibilities from the Refund Administrator in May 2023. This change was part of an effort to streamline and improve the efficiency of VAT refund processes. The VAT Refund Agency has different contact details from those given for the VAT Refund Administrator. As such, the contact details for the VAT Refund Agency are as follows:

Phone: +27 10 025 6371

Email: [email protected]

Physical address:

VAT Refund Agency
PO Box 16949
Pretoria North
South Africa 0116

Publications

Since the last issue of VAT Connect, the following documents impacting on VAT have been published on the SARS website (Refer to the Legal Counsel page and navigate to the respective subpages):

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Guides

Disclaimer

VAT Connect is an information guide and not an “official publication” as defined in section 1 of the TA Act and accordingly does not create a practice generally prevailing under section 5 of that Act. It is also not a binding general ruling (BGR) under section 89 of Chapter 7 of the TA Act nor a ruling under section 41B of the VAT Act. For general enquiries regarding VAT call the SARS Contact Centre on 0800 00 7277. Should there be any aspects relating to VAT on which a specific VAT ruling is required, you may apply for a ruling by completing form VAT301 and sending it together with all the necessary information to SARS by facsimile on +27 86 540 9390 or by e-mail to [email protected]. Refer also to the Quick Reference Guide on VAT Ruling Application Procedure for more details on how to apply for a ruling.

Find a Form

Find a Tax rate

Use our Digital Channels

Find a Publication

Find an FAQ

Report Suspicious Activity