High Court: 2025–2023

The judgments delivered in any of the High Court Divisions on this page are arranged per year and then per date of delivery.
 
High Court judgments delivered in another year, can be accessed through the navigation pane above.
 
2023
Date of DeliveryParties InvolvedApplicable LegislationKeywords/Summary
24 July 2023
New!
Trustees of the CC Share Trust and Others v CSARS (38211/21)

Tax Administration Act, 2011

Whether the applicants had been correctly assessed by SARS – whether the assessments may be set aside because they were unlawfully made for want of compliance by SARS with its own statutes – whether the Commissioner ought to withdraw the assessments.

17 July 2023NCP Alcohols (Pty) Ltd (D7515/2020)

Customs and Excise Act, 1964

Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, 2000

Customs and Excise: Issues for determination:

  1. Whether the respondent was entitled to impose
    custom duty, VAT, interest on VAT and penalties against the applicant when it exercised the administrative powers in terms of section 18A of the Act on the two consignments that were processed from 31 October to 03 November and on 12
    December 2014.
  2. Whether the decision and inspection of the applicant’s handling of the two consignments had prescribed as it was alleged that two years had expired since they were processed; whether the respondent was barred from imposing the custom duty, tax and VAT and VAT penalty due to the lapse of the two-year period and as provided for in section 18A(2)(c) of the Customs and Excise Act, 1964.
  3. Whether the conduct of the respondent in the decision to impose duty; the rejected internal appeal and the alternate dispute resolution (ADR) were invalid and reviewable for such were allegedly in violation of certain provisions section 6 of the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act, 2000.
17 July 2023Glencore Operations SA (Pty) Ltd and Others v CSARS and Another (15988/2020)

Customs and Excise Act, 1964

Customs and Excise: Issue for determination:

  1. Whether the Third Applicant (Goedenvonden JV) was the person in possession of the necessary mining authorisation granted or ceded in terms of the Mineral Petroleum Resources Development Act 28 of 2022, as contemplated in Note 6(f)(ii)(cc) of Part 3 of Schedule No. 6 of Customs and Excise Act 91 of 1964.
  2. In the alternative: Whether the Commissioner properly exercise his discretion (to allow the refunds for Goedgevonden JV in terms of Note 5 of Part 3 of Schedule No. 6 to the Customs and Excise Act.
  3. Whether the National Appeal Committee (in issuing the letter dated 13 June 2019-annexure FA3 to the Founding Affidavit) had the jurisdiction to entertain the appeal.
  4. Whether the National Appeal Committee was authorised to deal with the appeal after a delay of four years.
  5. Whether the National Appeal Committee (in issuing the letter dated 13 June 2019-annexure FA3) was empowered to make a new determination by adding a finding in paragraph 2(i) that the JV did not comply with Note 6(f)(ii)(cc) (concerning the mining authorisation) and by raising the demand from R5 099 995.21 to R82 984 080.00.
  6. Whether the National Appeal Committee was empowered to amend the original determination in terms of section 47(9)(d) of the Customs and Excise Act (as contemplated by SARS), as part of the internal administrative appeal instituted by the Applicants under Chapter XA of the Act.
6 July 2023
New!
CSARS v M (A5036/2023)

Tax Administration Act, 2011

Administration and Procedure: Appeal from the Tax Court – whether undeclared receipts and deposits into taxpayer’s personal bank accounts and other accruals were income or the repayment of loans – a factual issue.

Definition of “gross income” in section 1 of Act 58 of 1962 – the total amount, in cash or otherwise, received by or accrued to or in favour of a taxpayer not of a capital nature – an assessment is in respect of a specific amount – the taxpayer is required to address every single receipt and accrual, as detailed in the finalisation of audit letter – rule 7 of the Rules of the Tax Court – a taxpayer, in his objection, must specify in detail ‘the specific amount of the disputed assessment objected to’ – section 102(1)(a) of Act 28 of 2011 – ‘[a] taxpayer bears the burden of proving that an amount, transaction, event or item is exempt or otherwise not taxable’ –
Taxpayer failed to discharge the onus in most of the itemised assessed amounts.
Appeal upheld and the order of the Tax Court set aside.

5 July 2023Diageo SA (Pty) Ltd v CSARS (A223/2021)

Customs and Excise Act, 1964

Customs and Excise: Whether the inclusion of vanilla essence in its Cape Velvet liqueur – one of the ingredients marginally affecting the alcohol volume – disqualified the appellant from a lower tax rate.
29 May 2023Lion Match Company (Pty) Ltd v CSARS (A 202/2020; IT 13950)

Tax Administration Act, 2011

Income Tax Act, 1962

The appeal is twofold, namely:

  1. An appeal against the refusal of the application for postponement by the appellant (The Lion Match
    Company (Pty) Ltd and referred to as “LMC”); and
  2. A counter appeal against
    the refusal by the Tax Court to grant the adjustment to the assessment sought by the respondent against the assessment made by the Commissioner for the
    South African Revenue Services (the respondent a quo and in this appeal
    referred to as “CSARS”).
24 April 2023Tomson NO and Others v CSARS and Another (33918/2021)

Income Tax Act, 1962

Whether the decision taken on 29 March 2021 by the first respondent (SARS), to decline the trust’s request in terms of section 18A(2A)(b)(i) of Act 58 of 1962 to waive the minimum distribution requirements provided by the section, should be reviewed.
24 April 2023I-Cat International Consulting (Pty) Ltd v CSARS (41667/2021)

Tax Administration Act, 2011

Whether a decision of the Respondent (a request submitted by I-Cat to SARS for a reduced assessment in terms of section 93 of Act 28 of 2011 in respect of the I-Cat’s 2015 tax assessment) dated 26 January 2021 should be reviewed and set aside.
24 March 2023CSARS v Pearlstock (Pty) Ltd (A2/2021)

Customs and Excise Act, 1964

Excise duty: the classification or the interpretation of the TH of the goods, that is, of the PVC panels; whether the PVC Panels were “cellular” in ‘design and structure’ as contended by the respondent and as upheld by the court a quo, thus falling under TH 3921.12, or, whether the PVC used to produce the panels, although appearing to be externally ‘cellular in construction’, were not necessarily “cellular” as contended by the Commissioner, thus falling under TH 39.16; whether the evidence of Professor John, which the appellant (the Commissioner) relied on, was admissible.

13 March 2023CSARS v Grand Azania (Pty) Limited (33257/2021)

Companies Act, 1973

Tax Administration Act, 2011

Income Tax Act, 1962

Liquidation and Tax – Inability to pay debts: Whether the applicant made out a
case for the liquidation of the respondent

7 March 2023Henque 3935 CC t/a PQ Clothing Outlet (in Business Rescue) v CSARS (2020/35790)

Companies Act, 2008 

Income Tax Act, 1962

Tax Administration Act, 2011

Business rescue: Whether the Commissioner for the South African Revenue Service (SARS) can set-off a tax liability of a company against the VAT refunds due to the company in
circumstances where the tax liability concerns a period prior to the company entering into business rescue, but was only determined after the company had already entered into business rescue

17 February 2023Siyandisa Trading (Pty) Ltd v CSARS (A201/2021)

Income Tax Act, 1962

Tax Administration Act, 2011

Tax Law and Evidence: Depreciation allowance, finance charges, understatement penalty 

31 January  2023Lance Dickson Construction CC v CSARS (A211/2021)

Tax Administration Act, 2011

Understatement penalty: Whether the Tax Court, having found that SARS had failed to establish that the taxpayer’s understatement of its taxable income resulted from a failure to take reasonable care completing its return, was nonetheless entitled to impose a 25% penalty, SARS having failed to plead a case for the imposition of a penalty on any ground other than the one it failed to prove.

16 January 2023CSARS v Khagiso Afrika Holdings (Pty) Ltd and Others (49048/2021)

Tax Administration Act, 2011

Procedure: Whether or not the provisional order against some of the respondents should be made final.

Table of Contents

Last Updated:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print